As AI music generator tools become more popular, the number of options on the market keeps growing. So how do you choose the right AI music software for you?
If you’re a beginner, you might worry: you download a music generator, open the interface, and it’s all technical jargon – you have no idea how to use it. If you’re a professional producer, you might worry: these AI tools are too basic – they can’t even export MIDI, so there’s no way to fit them into your existing workflow. And of course, there’s the practical concern: you want to try a paid plan, but you’re afraid it won’t suit you, and you’ll end up wasting your money.
With those questions in mind, I spent a week testing both mainstream and niche AI music generator tools. I tried everything – from dead‑simple options for absolute beginners to professional‑grade platforms for experienced producers, from free trials to paid subscriptions.
In the end, I picked five tools I think are worth recommending. Some are feature‑packed, offering a complete all‑in‑one experience from generation to editing. Others specialize in pure instrumental music, delivering a large volume of high‑quality tracks. Below I’ve listed my test results for these five tools, so you can see which one best fits your own situation and needs.
How to Choose the Right AI Music Generator?
To help you compare the pros and cons of each tool more intuitively, I built an evaluation framework with four dimensions: generation quality, customization, ease of use, and price‑friendliness. Based on this framework, I tested five mainstream tools and created the comprehensive score table below.
Dimension | Evaluation Framework Content | Scoring Basis |
Generation Capability | Audio quality, structural integrity, style coverage, and vocal ability | Whether it can generate high‑quality, well‑structured, and diverse music styles, and whether vocals are supported |
Customization | Adjust BPM/key/time signature, choose instruments, edit MIDI, control mood | The depth of user control over the music – can it meet advanced creative needs? |
Ease of Use | Interface intuitiveness, onboarding guidance, need for music theory knowledge, and free trial. | Can beginners get started quickly? Is the operation simple and intuitive? |
Price Friendliness | Free version limitations, subscription plan reasonableness, commercial license inclusion | Cost‑effectiveness – does it suit different budgets? |
Tool | Generation Capability | Customization | Ease of Use | Price Friendliness | Overall Score |
MakeBestMusic | 9.5 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 9.1 |
AIVA | 9 | 9.5 | 6 | 7 | 8.5 |
Soundraw | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8.5 |
ilovesong | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8.1 |
Mubert | 8 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 8.1 |

Recommended rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Overview:
MakeBestMusic is an AI music generator that works well for both beginners who want to get started quickly and pros who want deep creative control. It supports the simplest text-to-song generation, as well as advanced features such as MIDI editing, track separation, and AI covers. Whether you’re a complete newbie, a content creator who needs high‑output efficiency, or a professional musician who demands fine‑grained control, you’ll find a creative workflow that suits you on this single platform.
Key features
Generation capability (9.5/10)
- Supports <strong>text to song</strong> (melody + vocals)
- 100+ music styles, understands complex style combinations
- CD‑quality output (44.1kHz/16‑bit)
- Fast generation – around 30 seconds for a full song
Customization (9/10)
- Customizable BPM, key, time signature, mood
- Multi‑track editing: separate vocal, accompaniment, and instrument tracks
- MIDI Studio: fine‑tune pitch, velocity, and duration of MIDI notes
- AI cover: transform existing songs into different vocal styles
Ease of use (10/10)
- Beginner mode: just type a sentence, AI generates lyrics + melody
- Custom mode: experienced users control every parameter
- Intuitive interface with clear guidance
- Free version gives 3 credits – enough for a full test drive
⭐️Other highlights
- AI lyric writer : enter keywords, get rhyming lyrics
- Remove vocals: upload any song and split into separate tracks
- Commercial license: one‑click Commercial License for e‑commerce, live streaming, ads, etc.
Pricing (Easter sale)

Best for:
✅ Absolute beginners
✅ Short‑form video / podcast creators
✅ E‑commerce and live‑streaming teams that need fast background music
✅ Music lovers who want to try AI covers
✅ Pro musicians looking for an “all‑in‑one” creative platform

Recommended rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Overview:
AIVA (Artificial Intelligence Virtual Artist) is an AI music generator designed specifically for film, game, and advertising scoring. Its core focus isn’t “quick generation” but “deep composition” – it’s more like a professional composer’s assistant than a one‑click song maker. That said, if you’re not in that field, its learning curve and feature set can feel overwhelming.
Key features
Generation capability (9/10)
- Generate from style, chord progression, reference audio, etc.
- Excels at orchestral, film score, and classical styles
- Master‑quality output (48kHz/24‑bit)
- Import MIDI and generate style variations
Customization (9.5/10)
AIVA’s customization is powerful. In my tests, I noted:
- from a style: choose instrumental style, key, length, number of variations
- step by step: generate MIDI tracks, edit each track’s sound, melody, notes
- from an influence: upload audio to generate similar style
- editor: edit MIDI tracks (volume, pan, EQ, delay, reverb)
- style designer: customize dynamics, rhythm variation, harmony strategy, orchestration
Ease of use (6/10)
- Steep learning curve – requires basic music theory
- Complex interface – not beginner‑friendly
- Free plan: 3 downloads per month – fine for light testing
Limitations
❌ No vocals/lyrics – instrumental only
❌ Very high entry barrier – you need to understand chord progressions, keys, MIDI editing, effect parameters, etc.
❌ Style focus: mainly orchestral, classical, film scores – weak in pop, electronic, etc.
Pricing

Best for:
- Film/game/ad composers
- Classical music lovers
- Advanced users with music theory knowledge who need deep control

Recommended rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Overview:
Soundraw focuses on providing “highly customizable” royalty‑free background music for content creators. Its biggest feature is a visual editing interface – you can mix and match music sections, instruments, and moods like building blocks. However, the fact that it only produces instrumental music (no vocals) means it can’t serve users who need songwriting.
Key features
Generation capability (8/10)
- Instrumental only – no vocals/lyrics
- 30+ modern electronic/pop styles
- 44.1kHz/16‑bit output
- Length: 15 seconds to 5 minutes
Customization (9/10)
- Unique “pick‑a‑tag” workflow
- Visual editing: freely adjust theme, tempo, instruments, etc.
- Fine control over sections: melody, pitch, volume, length
- Export MP3/WAV
Ease of use (9/10)
- Intuitive visual interface – low learning curve
- Free trial with download limits
- No music theory needed
Limitations
❌ No vocal capability – not suitable for songs with lyrics
❌ Limited style coverage – only 30+ styles
❌ Fewer features: no lyric generation, no AI covers – basic generation and section editing only
Pricing

Best for:
- Short‑form video creators who only need background music
- Brands needing customized instrumental tracks

Recommended rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Overview:
ilovesong (formerly SongR) is an ai music generator focused on “lyrics‑to‑music.” Its core idea is simple: you write lyrics, AI composes the melody. For users who already have lyric ideas but don’t know how to compose, this is a very direct creative path.
Key features
Generation capability (8/10)
- Input lyrics, AI generates melody and accompaniment
- Supports multiple pop styles
- Produces full songs with vocals
- Fast: 1‑2 minutes
Customization (6/10)
- You can tweak style prompts randomly
- Much less fine control than <strong>MakeBestMusic</strong> or AIVA
- Unique feature: AI singer video – turns song + portrait into a performance video
Ease of use (9/10)
- Extremely simple: paste lyrics, pick a style, click generate
- No registration required to try
- Great for absolute beginners
Limitations
❌ Single‑function: only “lyrics to music” – no multi‑track editing, no AI covers
❌ Weak fine control: can’t adjust key, instrumentation, etc.
❌ Free version is heavily watermarked – commercial use requires payment
❌ Unclear commercial licensing – no one‑click certificate like MakeBestMusic
Pricing

Best for:
- Users who already have lyrics and want a quick melody
- Creators who want to test how their lyrics sound set to music

Recommended rating: ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Overview:
Mubert is more of an “AI‑driven royalty‑free music platform” than a “music creation tool.” It has a huge music library and a real‑time generation engine, focused on providing high‑quality background music for video bloggers, podcasters, and app developers.
Key features
Generation capability (8/10)
- Real‑time generation based on a massive music library
- Covers almost all mainstream music styles
- Focuses on instrumental / background music – no vocal songs
- Stable output quality suitable for streaming
Customization (6/10)
- Filter by mood, style, scene keywords
Ease of use (10/10)
- Minimalist interface – as easy as using a music streaming app
- The free version can generate plenty of music
- No music knowledge required
Limitations
❌ Not true “creation” – Mubert is more like AI helping you “assemble” music from a library, not generating original works from scratch
❌ No vocal capability – can’t make songs with lyrics
❌ Weak fine control – only mood/style keywords, no detailed adjustments
❌ Commercial licensing is tiered and complex – different plans for different use cases, you must read carefully
Pricing

Best for:
- Short‑form video creators who need large volumes of background music
- Podcast hosts
Summary: Which Tool Is Right for You?
Quick selection guide
If you’re a complete beginner who wants a full song with vocals
→ Go with MakeBestMusic
Type one sentence, and it generates lyrics + melody + vocals in 30 seconds. ilovesong can also do this, but it lacks room for growth.
If you’re a short‑form video creator who needs background music
→ MakeBestMusic or Mubert
MakeBestMusic gives you truly original tracks (avoiding copyright matches). Mubert has a huge library and is fast. But if you ever want to add vocals, Mubert won’t work.
If you’re a professional composer who needs cinematic scoring
→ AIVA or MakeBestMusic
AIVA has deeper expertise in classical and orchestral music, but the learning curve is steep, and generation is slow. MakeBestMusic also supports complex scoring and is more approachable and faster.
If you want to make AI covers or train your own voice model
→ Only MakeBestMusic can do this.
AI Voice Cover is an exclusive feature of MakeBestMusic – none of the other four tools support it.
If you need a commercial license for e‑commerce, ads, or live streaming
→ First choice: MakeBestMusic
One‑click Commercial License certificate – clear and worry‑free. Other tools either have complicated licensing or require extra purchases.
Final Thoughts
After a week of in‑depth testing, I found that most AI music tools today have their own limitations. For example, AIVA’s features are mainly for professional scoring, which is too much of a learning curve for ordinary creators. Soundraw focuses on instrumental music and lacks vocal support. ilovesong leans toward turning existing lyrics into melodies. Mubert feels more like a music library search tool than a from‑scratch creative workstation.
Against this backdrop, my experience is that MakeBestMusic offers a relatively complete feature set. It not only supports fast generation but also provides MIDI editing for those who want to polish their work further. This closed‑loop experience – from generation to editing – truly serves both beginners and experienced creators. And it’s clear commercial licensing gives peace of mind.
That said, as I mentioned before, there is no absolute “best” tool – only the tool that best fits your current needs. If you’re looking for a relatively comprehensive creative platform, MakeBestMusic is definitely worth considering.
