David Ruzumna, a seasoned attorney with nearly three decades of experience, has built a career centered on authenticity, professionalism, and a commitment to both the letter and spirit of the law. Born and raised in Los Angeles, David Ruzumna earned his sociology degree from Humboldt State University before attending law school, launching a solo practice, and even running for judge. Since 2000, he has successfully maintained his law practice while also serving as a judge pro tem across multiple courts and counties. In this interview, David shares the guiding principles behind his leadership approach, decision-making style, and relationship-building techniques. The conversation offers insight into how these values have shaped his longevity and effectiveness in the legal field.
What leadership approach has helped you grow your practice and build trust with clients and peers?
Prospective clients want an attorney who is both knowledgeable and confident. It’s essential to present yourself accordingly, but it’s just as important not to come across as a cocky blowhard. One of the best ways to achieve this balance is through candor, especially when asked a question you don’t immediately know the answer to. Attorneys aren’t encyclopedias of legal knowledge; what sets a good attorney apart is knowing where and how to find the answer.
In your experience, what are the key components of effective legal decision-making?
Start by knowing the elements of each legal claim and ensure you have evidence to support—or rebut—those elements from the outset. Don’t wait until trial preparation to gather your facts. It’s also critical not to lose sight of common sense. If your legal reasoning leads to an absurd outcome, that’s a sign your argument needs to be reevaluated.
How have you cultivated and maintained strong professional relationships over time?
I’ve learned to become comfortable with professional conflict. Zealous advocacy and civility aren’t mutually exclusive. I make it a point to call opposing counsel early in a case to introduce myself and set clear expectations. Civility costs nothing and often sets the tone for more productive interactions throughout the litigation process.
What ongoing legal training or continuing education do you pursue to stay sharp and informed?
The Washington State Bar Association mandates Continuing Legal Education (CLE), but I treat their requirements as a floor, not a ceiling. I aim to exceed the minimum and often revisit topics I already know well, just to make sure I’m still aligned with current standards. I’ve also taken the opportunity to serve as a CLE presenter, which is a great way to refresh my own knowledge while helping others.
How do you break down large, complex cases into manageable and trackable legal goals?
I always start by outlining the elements of each claim, whether I’m pursuing or defending it. Then I determine which facts apply to each element. This structured approach allows me to track progress and identify gaps early in the litigation process.
When facing difficult client or case dynamics, how do you maintain professionalism and client confidence?
Professionalism is a choice you can make regardless of how others behave. I maintain boundaries and consistently redirect the conversation to the relevant legal factors. If opposing counsel’s conduct becomes frustrating, I remind myself that I can only control my own actions and reactions. If something really gets under my skin, that’s usually a sign of something internal that I need to address.
What characteristics do you believe define a strong legal leader, and how do you strive to embody them?
Stoicism plays a big role. Everyone has moments of self-doubt, but in a leadership position, you need to internalize those feelings and present a steady front. After listening to the team, make a decision and stick to it—decisiveness builds trust. I try to demonstrate this kind of strength professionally, while knowing I have personal outlets like my wife and long-time friends for support.
Can you share a time when you guided a colleague through a tough legal or ethical situation?
Most ethical challenges stem from the temptation to bend the truth. My advice is simple: be honest. In litigation, if a fact hurts your case, don’t lie about it—just stay silent. Truthfulness simplifies life and reinforces your credibility with colleagues, clients, and opposing counsel.
How do you determine what tasks you should manage personally versus what can be delegated?
I look at the level of discretion involved and the potential consequences if something goes wrong. Tasks with minimal discretion are usually safe to delegate. However, if a task has low discretion but high stakes, I stay involved to monitor progress and double-check the outcomes.
What motivates your team—or those you mentor—to deliver their best in high-pressure settings?
Recognition goes a long way. People generally want to do good work, but feeling unseen or unappreciated can erode that motivation. I make it a point to acknowledge strong performance and give specific praise when it’s deserved.
Reflecting on your career, what keeps you passionate about practicing law after nearly 30 years?
Each case presents a unique set of challenges, and that keeps things interesting. I also enjoy the strategic aspect—figuring out how to structure a case or argue a point of law effectively. On a deeper level, I believe the legal profession offers a meaningful way to help people navigate complex and often stressful situations.
How has your experience as a judge pro tem influenced your perspective as an attorney?
It’s given me a clearer sense of what matters in the courtroom. Judges appreciate clarity, preparation, and respect for the process. Having been on the bench, I’m more attuned to how arguments and behaviors are perceived from that vantage point, and that insight informs how I approach my cases.
What advice would you give to new attorneys entering the legal profession today?
Focus on developing your judgment and your integrity. Skills and knowledge matter, but judgment is what helps you apply those tools effectively. And without integrity, none of it holds up. Be honest, be prepared, and never stop learning.
David Ruzumna’s reflections offer a grounded view of what it takes to succeed and grow in the legal field over time. His candid approach to leadership, unwavering professionalism, and thoughtful mentorship style make him a respected figure among peers and clients alike.
Thank you to David Ruzumna for taking the time to share his insights.