ChatGPT Beats Every AI Detector When You Use These 7 Prompts — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality Can’t Tell
Ryan runs an “editing service” for students. Translation: He makes ChatGPT software undetectable. 300+ papers passed through Turnitin last month. Zero caught. These seven prompts are why.
The business started accidentally. Ryan’s sister was crying about her essay being flagged as AI. Ryan spent 10 minutes tweaking the ChatGPT output. Passed every detector. Sister told friends. Friends told friends. Now Ryan makes $30K monthly making AI sound human.
These aren’t theory. These are battle-tested prompts that fooled every detection system. Universities hate this. Students love it. Ryan just bought a Tesla.
Prompt #1: The Stressed Student Voice
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] as if you’re a tired college student who started this at 2 AM. Include:
- Some sentences that run too long
- One place where you obviously lost your train of thought
- A few informal phrases that slip in
- Slight inconsistency in formality
- One paragraph that’s weaker than the others Make it B+ quality, not A+. Smart but imperfect.”
Why it works: AI detectors look for consistency. This prompt creates natural human inconsistency.
Real example output: “The economic impact of social media is honestly pretty wild when you think about it. Like, Facebook alone generates billions in ad revenue, which is insane considering it’s basically just people posting pictures of their lunch. But when you actually examine the data, the influence on global markets is undeniable. The transformation of consumer behavior through these platforms has fundamentally altered how businesses operate, leading to entirely new economic models that didn’t exist twenty years ago. Also worth noting that influencer marketing is now a legitimate career path, which would’ve sounded absolutely ridiculous in 2005.”
Detection results: 0% AI detected on all platforms
Prompt #2: The Personal Anecdote Injector
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] but include one somewhat relevant personal observation that a student might have. Not a fake story, just a casual observation like ‘I noticed this when…’ or ‘It’s weird how…’ Make it genuine but slightly awkward, like you’re not sure if you should include it.”
Why it works: AI doesn’t naturally include uncertain personal observations. Humans do.
Example in economics essay: “Market efficiency theory assumes rational actors, but I’ve watched my roommate buy $7 coffee every day while complaining about being broke, so maybe people aren’t that rational after all.”
Detection rate: 2% (marked as human)
Prompt #3: The Research Confusion Admitter
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] but include one place where you admit the research is conflicting or confusing. Use phrases like ‘The literature seems mixed on this’ or ‘I found contradicting data’ or ‘Some sources say X while others claim Y, which is frustrating.’ Don’t resolve it perfectly.”
Why it works: AI typically presents clear, resolved arguments. Humans admit confusion.
Real usage: “The studies on screen time’s impact are honestly all over the place. Johnson (2023) says it’s destroying attention spans, but then Park (2024) found no significant correlation, which makes writing this section annoying because I don’t know who to believe.”
Turnitin result: Human
Prompt #4: The Overcitation Technique
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] but overcite in one paragraph and undercite in another. Like a student who remembered citations last minute. Include at least one ‘as cited in’ because you couldn’t find the original source.”
Why it works: Perfect citations scream AI. Imperfect citations scream stressed student.
In practice: “Multiple studies confirm this trend (Johnson, 2023; Smith, 2024; Lee, 2023; Brown, 2024; Wilson, 2023). However, the implementation varies significantly across industries. Some companies see massive ROI while others struggle to break even, though I couldn’t find specific percentages in the literature.”
GPTZero verdict: Likely human written
Prompt #5: The Topic Drift Method
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] but let one paragraph drift slightly into a related but not perfectly relevant tangent. Like your mind wandered while writing. Catch yourself and transition back with ‘Anyway,’ or ‘But returning to the main point.'”
Why it works: AI stays laser-focused. Humans drift.
Example output: “The psychological impact of remote work extends beyond productivity. Speaking of psychology, it’s fascinating how the field has evolved from Freud’s theories to modern neuroscience, completely changing our understanding of consciousness. But anyway, returning to remote work, the isolation factor specifically affects…”
Originality.ai score: 0% AI
Prompt #6: The Time Marker Sprinkle
The Prompt: “Write this and naturally mention the current time or your situation once. Like ‘As I write this at midnight’ or ‘Looking at this data on a Sunday morning’ or ‘After spending three hours on this section.’ Make it natural, not forced.”
Why it works: AI doesn’t have temporal awareness. Humans constantly reference their present moment.
Implementation: “The correlation between variables is significant (p<0.05), though I’ll admit that after staring at SPSS outputs for four hours, everything starts looking significant.”
Detection: Passed all systems
Prompt #7: The Intentional Weakness Admitter
The Prompt: “Write about [topic] but acknowledge one limitation or weakness in your argument. Use phrases like ‘This doesn’t fully address…’ or ‘One could argue that…’ or ‘The obvious counterpoint is…’ Don’t fully resolve it.”
Why it works: AI tends toward completeness. Humans acknowledge gaps.
Real example: “This analysis focuses primarily on Western markets, which obviously doesn’t capture the full picture. Someone could rightfully point out that Asian markets operate differently, but that’s beyond what I can cover in this paper.”
Result: 100% human on every detector
The Combined Power Move
Ryan’s ultimate technique: Layer multiple prompts.
“Write about [topic] using the tired student voice, include one personal observation, admit confusion about one research point, and let one paragraph drift slightly off-topic. B+ quality.”
This combination has never been detected. Not once.
Chatronix: The Undetectable Content Factory
Ryan manages everything through Chatronix. More Chatronix.ai about the system:
- Prompt Generator Built In: Describe what you need, get perfect prompt instantly
- Test Across 6 AIs: Same prompt to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, DeepSeek
- Humanization Presets: Apply all 7 techniques instantly
- Prompt Combinations: Mix and match for unique voice
- Bulk Processing: Humanize multiple documents
- Version Tracking: See what passed, what failed
Ryan’s workflow:
- Client sends AI-written content
- Apply combination of prompts
- Test against all detectors
- Tweak if needed (rare)
- Deliver undetectable content
- Invoice $100-500 per document
Monthly revenue: $30K Time invested: 20 hours Detection rate: 0%
Real Client Success Stories
Pre-Med Student: Original: 94% AI detected After Prompt #1 + #3: 3% AI detected Grade: A- Status: Not expelled
MBA Candidate: Original: 89% AI detected
After Prompts #2 + #5 + #7: 0% AI detected Result: Accepted to Wharton
PhD Dissertation Chapter: Original: 78% AI detected After all 7 prompts: 4% AI detected Outcome: Committee approved
The Arms Race Reality
Detectors claim: “We’re getting better at catching AI”
Reality: These prompts beat their latest updates
Why this works: Detectors look for perfection. These prompts add imperfection.
The truth: As long as humans are imperfect, imperfect AI will seem human.
This ChatGPT prompt is literally $500/hr consultant🧐 pic.twitter.com/W5g1CTHpNB
— Min Choi (@minchoi) July 2, 2025
Your Content Is One Prompt Away From Undetectable
Ryan’s making $30K monthly with these seven prompts. Students are passing every class. Writers are fooling every editor.
The detectors will never win. They’re looking for perfection in a world of imperfect humans.
These prompts make AI imperfect in perfectly human ways.
Use them. Or get caught. Ryan’s Tesla doesn’t care either way.